200 Meters Away: Did the Houthis Nearly Sink a Navy Aircraft Carrier?
What You Need to Know: A recent report revealed that Houthi rebels in Yemen nearly struck the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower with a missile earlier this year. The missile came within just 200 meters of the carrier, highlighting the escalating threat posed by non-state actors equipped with advanced weaponry.
-Since the outbreak of conflict between Israel and Hamas, the Iran-backed Houthis have intensified attacks on international shipping lanes in the Red Sea and surrounding regions.
-The incident raises concerns about the vulnerability of U.S. naval assets and has implications for U.S. readiness in potential confrontations with more sophisticated adversaries like China.
An Aircraft Carrier Nearly Sunk By the Houthis?
The Houthi rebels nearly hit a US aircraft carrier with a missile, new report shows. The incident, which occurred earlier it the year, but was only just reported in the October issue of CTC Sentinel (Combating Terrorism Center at West Point’s monthly publication), suggests that the Houthi missile came within just 200 meters of the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower.
“By some accounts, an ASBM [anti-ship ballistic missile] or other missile arrived at a very shallow trajectory, with minimal warning, without a chance for interception, and splashing down around 200 meters [656 feet]” from the Eisenhower. In other words: it was a close call.
Attacking the Shipping Lane
The Houthis, whom Iran supports, have been attacking international shipping lanes in the Red Sea, the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, and the Gulf of Aden ever since the war between Israel and Hamas began last October. The Eisenhower, along with other US and European vessels, were sent to the region to protect civilian ships traversing through the shipping lanes.
The Eisenhower, in particular, was quite busy during the deployment, expending “155 surface-to-air missiles, 135 land-attack cruise missiles, nearly 60 air-to-air missiles and 420 air-to-surface weapons during what is called a “historic” combat deployment,” Newsweek reported.
But the Eisenhower has been a target, as well. The Houthis, who have a diverse arsenal, including air, land, and sea drones, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles, have been pushing back against the American presence in the region. The Eisenhower has relied upon its Carrier Strike Group, which includes a cruiser and destroyers, for protection. “The cruiser and destroyers, which were armed with missiles for air defense, formed a defensive layer to protect the aircraft carrier,” Newsweek reported. “Meanwhile, fighter jets aboard the aircraft carrier, equipped with air-to-air missiles, can shoot down slow-flying drones and missiles.” Fortunately, the Eisenhower itself is equipped with self-defense weaponry, including surface-to-air missiles and gun systems for close-in threats.
Yet, the fact that low-tech drones and missiles, in the possession of a relatively rag-tag terrorist organization, can pose a legitimate threat to a multi-billion-dollar American supercarrier should be a point of concern – and speaks to the increased relevance of non-state actors in the post-Cold War global order. The aircraft carrier is a symbol for a nation’s prestige, military might, and technical prowess; that a rebel group armed with drones and missiles can threaten such a symbol perhaps transcends symbolism.
The supercarrier’s vulnerability to the Houthi rebels is also likely to exacerbate concerns over naval readiness for a confrontation with China. US strategy in the Indo-Pacific, where China has become increasingly assertive, depends upon successful aircraft carrier deterrence. Yet, to keep the carrier fleet safe from China’s (relative to the Houthi’s) sophisticated weaponry, America’s flagships may have a muted impact on any conflict.
But, frankly, the US public does not have, nor should have, the tolerance for the loss of a supercarrier. The human and fiscal toll implicit in the loss of just one supercarrier would be a shock to the conscious for a nation that has been able to engage in foreign conflict in a slow-burning, partially-committed sort of way for nearly two generations.
About the Author: Harrison Kass
Harrison Kass is a defense and national security writer with over 1,000 total pieces on issues involving global affairs. An attorney, pilot, guitarist, and minor pro hockey player, Harrison joined the US Air Force as a Pilot Trainee but was medically discharged. Harrison holds a BA from Lake Forest College, a JD from the University of Oregon, and an MA from New York University. Harrison listens to Dokken.
Image Credit: Creative Commons and/or Shutterstock.