Algerian attack survivor vows to be heard in court battle with award-winning author

Kamel Daoud's novel "Houris" -- banned in Algeria and awarded France's top literary prize Prix Goncourt last year -- tells the story of a child who loses her voice when an Islamist cuts her throat during the 1990s war.

Last November, Arbane took the literary world by storm when she announced on Algerian television, using a speech aid, that the novel's main character was based on her experiences without her consent.

She said the book's details were too similar to the personal stories she had narrated during years of treatment with her psychotherapist, Aicha Dahdouh -- who is Daoud's wife.

Daoud, 54, has denied his novel is based on Arbane's life, but the woman who is suing him both in France and Algeria has vowed to "defend (her) integrity".

Court hearings have begun in the French case, while according to Paris's foreign ministry, Algerian authorities have issued two arrest warrants against Daoud following Arbane's complaint.

Speaking through a breathing tube, Arbane was barely audible in a video call with AFP from Algeria. She later answered questions in written responses.

She said she had been a victim as a child when she lost relatives, including both of her parents, during the attack in 2000.

"But now, I am an adult, a woman, a mother who knows how to say stop, even if I no longer have a voice," she wrote.
'Betrayed'
"The novel draws directly from the most intimate parts of my life, which I shared in a medical setting," she said.

"I felt betrayed, humiliated," she added. "Clearly, what I read in that novel amounts to a violation of medical confidentiality and of my privacy."

Now married and a mother, she said her therapy sessions had been "highjacked to become literary material".

"It's not just a mistake," she added. "It's a professional, legal, human and ethical failing."

Filed complaints outlined several alleged similarities between Arbane and Aube, the novel's protagonist: the breathing tube, a slashed throat, identical scar and tattoos, and a hair salon both she and Aube owned.

Daoud has denied modelling the novel on the content of her therapy sessions. He said in December "everyone" knew the story in Algeria. "It's public knowledge."

But she disagrees.

For him to say that, Arbane told AFP, "amounts to dispossessing me a second time of my truth and voice. This is an attempt to make light of something very serious."

"My story has never been public," she said.
'Terrible dispossession'
Daoud also suggested that Arbane was being manipulated by the Algerian government in what his publisher described as "violent defamatory campaigns" against him.

"To say I'm being used by the Algerian authorities is just a cowardly attempt to discredit my words by politicising them," she responded.

Arbane said her main ordeal now was "reawakened traumas".

"I felt a terrible sense of dispossession, the impression that what I had lived through was banal, that I was at the mercy of anyone -- a killer, like the first time, or a man, an author," she said.

She said Daoud's wife, with whom she later developed a friendship, had repeatedly approached her asking if she would allow the author to write about her life -- and each time, she said, she turned down the proposal.

"I launched these legal proceedings in France and Algeria to defend my integrity and to say that... forgotten stories deserve respect," she said.

"I'm not trying to censor a writer. I'm trying to have a real and very serious harm acknowledged."