U-turning Starmer is putting the brakes on Trump’s tantrums – let’s hope it lasts
I hate to get ahead of myself, but it looks like Keir Starmer might have finally learnt the only language Trump understands.
For a decade now, leaders have faced Donald Trump with the same tactic: smile, soothe, flatter, and hope he gets bored.
Treat him like a temperamental relative at Christmas dinner. Laugh off the weird comments. Change the subject. Anything to appease.
And for a decade now, it hasn’t worked. In failing to learn from their mistakes, leaders have taught Trump just one lesson: if he throws his weight around, the rest of us will obligingly rearrange ourselves around his ego.
This week, at long last, we got a tantalising glimpse of an alternative reality.
Opposition has consequences. When enough leaders resist together, Trump is forced to confront the reality of his own actions, and the limits of his power.
At the invite-only Davos World Economic Forum summit, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s speech went viral because he called the moment out – ‘We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition,’ – reminding us that ‘nostalgia is not a strategy.’
Trump responded with bluster, taking swipes at Carney and insisting Canada should be ‘grateful’. These comments, along with his general air of confusion and apparent inability to distinguish Greenland from Iceland, gave the distinct impression of a man flailing under pressure.
And the reaction was noteworthy, to say the least. For perhaps the first time, the world was unintimidated, disinclined to yield to his latest hissy fit.
At a private dinner, Trump’s Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, laid into Europe – and got booed. There was a chorus of jeers and a parade of walk-outs.
Lutnick tried to shrug it off. He may put on a brave face but his authority (and ego) was undeniably dented.
To its credit, Europe has been clearer than Britain about consequences. Brussels openly – and pretty aggressively – discussed retaliation and sanctions, warning that it is not afraid to fight economic coercion.
For its own part, Westminster chose to take a more cautious route. It probably should have come as no surprise, given the U-turns that have become a hallmark of Labour’s tenure thus far (13 backtracks and counting, just for the record).
Frustration seemed to be mounting with every dithering equivocation.
But now, it looks like we might actually be making headway. We’ve been around the houses, but Starmer has finally started sounding like someone who understands Trump.
The tone shift has been undeniable. It started on the weekend, with Starmer slamming Trump’s tariff threats on allies as ‘completely wrong’. It was as forceful an admonishment as we’ve ever seen from the PM.
Then, at Monday’s Downing Street press conference, Starmer spoke of ‘pragmatic, sensible and sustained’ solutions to the crisis, asserting the efficacy of ‘calm discussion’ over ‘gesture politics’.
There was talk of a trade war being in nobody’s interests, but the blunt message of his address was simply this: Britain does not do diplomacy by pressure.
He is right. We are proudly a country of respect, partnership and the rule of law – not supplicancy.
Then came Westminster’s weekly pantomime: Prime Minister’s Questions.
But instead of – or at least in addition to – the usual slapstick, what we got felt like a small echo of Churchill’s ‘never surrender’. Starmer hammered home the point: ‘Britain will not yield’ on its principles and values.
He went on to accuse Trump of using the Chagos islands – a deal he once supported – as leverage to pressure Britain over Greenland, and refused.
‘He wants me to yield… I’m not going to.’
I thought to myself, finally: the clearest sign yet that Britain will not be rolled, bumped and pushed about. This is the moment where Trump’s pressure tactics get stared down with resistance, not grovelling.
And right on cue, The President blinked.
After days of noise about tariffs linked to Greenland, he started talking about a ‘framework’ and backing away from the threat.
Trump will frame this backpedalling ‘deal’ as forward momentum made on his terms, but let’s call it what it is: capitulation.
This is the opening for Starmer, and it is bigger than one news cycle.
For months, his premiership has looked like it is shrinking. The polls have sagged, his authority – despite commanding an overwhelming Commons majority – has taken hits, and the country has felt stuck in reactive mode.
This week finally offered a different version: clear, firm, and willing to hold a line.
And it was just this morning that we had the latest deployment of the ‘treat ’em mean’ approach, with Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper RSVPing ‘not today’ to Trump’s Board of Peace invitation.
If we want Britain back leading on the world stage, this is how. Not with nostalgia, and not with solo heroics. With Europe, with a backbone, and with the moral clarity we were once famed for.
This is the strongest avenue we’ve had yet to rebuild British credibility after a decade of drift.
Trump’s method relies on isolating targets and turning allies into servants one by one, so each country negotiates alone with the biggest bloke (some might say bully) in the room.
The antidote is coordinated pushback. Britain and Europe together can make him back down, again and again, until pressure stops paying.
Starmer must – in Labour’s own words – go further and faster. ‘Britain will not yield’ must translate into practical solidarity with Denmark and Greenland’s right to choose its future, coordinated economic planning with the EU, and common messaging so Trump cannot play us off against each other.
This is not risk free. Standing up to Trump dents his ego, and if we’ve learnt anything, it’s that a bruised Trump does not reflect or reconsider, he retaliates.
If he cannot get his way on Greenland this week, he will go hunting for another target next week. But this can’t be a matter of distraction being the best form of defence: resistance has to be a constant process, not a one-off performance.
What we’re seeing now is the consequence of a coordinated process of resistance.
Historically, the UK has been a world leader in resistance and determination. What happens in the coming days, weeks and months will determine whether Westminster has the mettle to hold firm – to not be deferential in its diplomacy.
What remains to be seen is if Starmer’s up to the challenge.
Do you have a story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing jessica.aureli@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.