Why I Stopped Calling Myself a “Real Artist”
The moment I knew I was lying to myself
I was sitting in a coffee shop last month, laptop open to a half-finished illustration, when someone asked what I do for work. “I’m a graphic designer,” I said, “but I’m really an artist.” The words felt sticky in my mouth. I’d been saying this for three years, always with that qualifier, always positioning my paying work as the thing that funds my “real” creative work.
That night I looked at my art folder. Twelve unfinished paintings. Six abandoned digital pieces. A stack of expensive canvases I bought eighteen months ago, still wrapped in plastic. I realized I’d been using the identity of “artist” as a shield against actually making art. Worse, I’d been dismissing the creative problem-solving I do every day as somehow less legitimate than whatever mythical pure creation I thought I should be doing instead.
The creativity hierarchy that doesn’t exist
I used to believe there was a clear hierarchy in creative work. Fine art at the top, commercial design somewhere in the murky middle, and anything that involved a client brief or budget constraints was selling out. This belief was poison. It kept me from appreciating the genuine creativity required to solve a packaging problem for a local brewery or design a logo that needs to work across seventeen different applications.
Last year I worked on a project redesigning the wayfinding system for a children’s hospital. The constraints were brutal: had to be readable by stressed parents, engaging for kids, work in three languages, and function under fluorescent lighting. Those limitations didn’t kill creativity, they demanded it. I had to invent new approaches I never would have discovered if I’d been making “pure” art in my studio.
The breakthrough came when I stopped seeing constraints as creative prison bars. Started seeing them as the scaffolding that makes ambitious work possible. Every brief, every budget, every impossible deadline has taught me something about making things that matter to people other than myself.
What nobody tells you about creative consistency
The Instagram version of creative work shows morning coffee, perfect lighting, and finished pieces emerging like magic. The reality? Most creative work happens in fifteen-minute chunks between meetings, late at night when your brain feels like mush, or during lunch breaks when you’re trying to eat a sandwich with one hand while moving shapes around with the other.
I used to think I needed four-hour blocks of uninterrupted time to do anything meaningful. This belief kept me from starting most projects. Then I began tracking my actual creative output and discovered something surprising: my best work often came from those fragmented sessions. The forced breaks gave my subconscious time to process. Coming back to a project with fresh eyes after a day of other work often revealed solutions I’d missed during longer sessions.
The myth of the tortured genius waiting for inspiration is comfortable because it explains why you’re not making work. The truth is less romantic but more useful: creativity is mostly about showing up consistently, even when the conditions aren’t perfect. Especially when they aren’t perfect.
The economics of creative work changed my process
For the first five years of freelancing, I treated money conversations like necessary evils that distracted from the “real” creative work. I’d spend weeks perfecting a concept, present three detailed options to a client, then accept whatever budget they offered because asking for more felt like admitting I was just in it for the money.
This approach nearly killed my creative practice. When you consistently undervalue your work, you end up taking projects that drain your energy without providing resources for the experiments that fuel growth. I was stuck in a cycle of rush jobs that left no time for developing new skills or exploring ideas that excited me.
Everything changed when I started seeing money as creative fuel rather than creative compromise. A fair rate for a logo project means I can afford to spend two days experimenting with a new illustration technique. Charging appropriately for brand work gives me the freedom to turn down projects that don’t align with where I want to grow. Money isn’t separate from creativity, it’s what makes sustained creative work possible.
What I wish I’d known about creative courage
I spent years waiting to feel ready before sharing work publicly. Ready meant perfect, which meant never. I’d polish projects until they lost all personality, or abandon them entirely when I noticed a flaw. The work that stayed hidden couldn’t teach me anything about what connected with others or how to improve.
The shift happened when I started viewing sharing work as part of the creative process, not the end goal. Posting a sketch that’s 70% complete often generates feedback that makes the final 30% stronger. Showing failed experiments helps other people feel permission to share their own messy work in progress.
Creative courage isn’t about feeling fearless, it’s about getting comfortable with the specific discomfort of putting imperfect work into the world. The vulnerability never goes away, but your capacity to work alongside it grows. Each time you share something before it feels ready, you expand your tolerance for the productive discomfort that lives at the heart of all meaningful creative work.
I still catch myself falling back into old patterns sometimes. The desire to wait for perfect conditions or dismiss commercial work as less creative runs deep. But now I recognize these thoughts as invitations to examine what I actually believe about creativity versus what I inherited from romantic myths about artistic purity. The reality of creative work is messier than the myths suggest, but it’s also more generous. There’s room for all of it: the commercial projects that pay bills, the personal experiments that feed your soul, and everything in between that defies easy categorization.
The post Why I Stopped Calling Myself a “Real Artist” first appeared on Irinagundareva.