ADHD Medication Curbs Violence and Public Disorder Crimes, Study Finds
In the complex landscape of adolescent mental health, where the lines between disorder and delinquency often blur, a new study has shed light on a potential link between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment and crime reduction.
The research, published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP), suggests that pharmacological treatment of ADHD can significantly reduce violence- and public-order related crimes among adolescents in the “grey zone” for such treatment.
Variation in Treatment Rates Reveals Impact on Crime
The study, led by Dr Tarjei Widding-Havneraas and Professor Arnstein Mykletun, leveraged the variation in healthcare providers’ treatment preferences as a quasi-experimental design. By comparing patients who received medication due to their clinician’s “liberal” perspective with those who remained untreated due to their clinician’s “restrictive” view, the researchers were able to isolate the effect of ADHD medication on criminal outcomes.
Protective Effect Limited to Specific Crimes
While pharmacological treatment of ADHD showed a protective effect on violence- and public-order related charges, it did not appear to impact other types of crime, such as drug offenses, traffic violations, or property crimes. This nuanced finding underscores the complexity of the relationship between ADHD and criminality, and the need for targeted interventions.
The study, conducted in Norway where all ADHD treatment for children and adolescents occurs in the public healthcare system, followed 5,624 patients aged 10 to 18 years who were diagnosed with ADHD between 2009 and 2011. By combining this comprehensive registry data with the quasi-experimental design, the researchers were able to address the ethical and practical challenges that have limited previous studies in this area.
As clinicians and researchers continue to navigate the controversies surrounding ADHD treatment, this study provides a valuable piece of the puzzle. While the effect sizes suggest that many patients may need to be treated to prevent a single additional crime, the findings contribute to a growing body of causal knowledge that can inform treatment decisions and public policy.